Capture & constraints
Existing-record review, imagery selection, survey requirements, permissions, and an explicit accuracy budget.
Turn imagery, survey records, and operational data into maps with traceable evidence.
An attractive map is insufficient when an engineer needs to know when an asset was surveyed and how reliable its position is. We connect capture, quality checks, registries, and field workflows so each object has an accountable source.
Change detection compares observations of the same ground over time. The output is a list of candidates with their evidence, and ground hidden by cloud is marked as not assessed.
Bare soil and six new roofs where a crop field was. Queued for a permit check.
Tree cover replaced by bare ground. Needs a field visit before anyone calls it clearing.
A linear change joining the main road. Could be a track or a drainage cut; unconfirmed.
Masked in the later capture. No change is claimed until a clear acquisition exists.
Existing-record review, imagery selection, survey requirements, permissions, and an explicit accuracy budget.
Versioned spatial objects, coordinate-reference metadata, capture dates, instrument details, and quality flags.
Web maps, change detection, asset registries, routing, and GIS/BIM integration appropriate to the workflow.
Documented exports, catalogues, maintenance responsibilities, and the evidence needed to investigate a disputed object.
We catalogue imagery and derived layers with the SpatioTemporal Asset Catalog (STAC) specification, which gives a common structure for describing and cataloguing spatiotemporal assets.1 A STAC API search filters by collection, bounding box or geometry, and time range, so every derived map can be traced back to the scenes that produced it.2
Copernicus Sentinel-2 samples 13 spectral bands at 10, 20, and 60 metre resolution and is designed to revisit the same point every 5 days at the equator.3 That suits land-cover and vegetation change across a district. Parcel or asset work usually needs higher-resolution tasking, drone capture, or field survey.
Before comparing captures we mask cloud, cloud shadow, and cirrus with the scene classification map produced for each Level-2A product.4 A scene-level cloud percentage cannot tell you which pixels over your site are clear.
Pixel size is not positional accuracy. The ASPRS standard sets accuracy thresholds independent of ground sample distance and requires at least 30 checkpoints for a fully compliant assessment.5 Rasters are delivered as Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF, an OGC standard that uses HTTP range requests so a client downloads only the parts of an image it needs.6
Every analysis starts from a reproducible catalogue query. This one asks the public Earth Search STAC API for Sentinel-2 Level-2A scenes over central Dhaka with under 10 percent estimated cloud.23 The cloud filter uses the STAC Query extension, which this endpoint supports; clear pixels are then chosen with the scene classification layer.4
curl -s https://earth-search.aws.element84.com/v1/search \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{
"collections": ["sentinel-2-l2a"],
"bbox": [90.35, 23.70, 90.45, 23.82],
"datetime": "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z/2026-03-31T23:59:59Z",
"query": { "eo:cloud_cover": { "lt": 10 } },
"limit": 20
}' | jq '.features[] | {id, date: .properties.datetime, cloud: .properties["eo:cloud_cover"]}'Choose one area and reconcile the available records before commissioning additional capture. Specialist field delivery is scoped with the relevant partners.
Primary sources for the standards and practices referenced on this page. They describe the field, not Verne's own results.
In 7–10 working days, Verne maps your workflows, data sources, repetitive decisions, automation opportunities, and AI risk areas. You receive a prioritized roadmap showing what to automate, integrate, avoid, and build first.